PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION v13
An SPL program can be declared as an autonomous transaction by specifying the following directive in the declaration section of the SPL block:
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
An autonomous transaction is an independent transaction started by a calling program. A commit or rollback of SQL commands within the autonomous transaction has no effect on the commit or rollback in any transaction of the calling program. A commit or rollback in the calling program has no effect on the commit or rollback of SQL commands in the autonomous transaction.
The following SPL programs can include PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION:
- Standalone procedures and functions
- Anonymous blocks
- Procedures and functions declared as subprograms within packages and other calling procedures, functions, and anonymous blocks
- Triggers
- Object type methods
The following are issues and restrictions related to autonomous transactions:
- Each autonomous transaction consumes a connection slot for as long as it is in progress. In some cases, this may mean that the
max_connectionsparameter in thepostgresql.conffile should be raised. - In most respects, an autonomous transaction behaves exactly as if it was a completely separate session, but GUCs (that is, settings established with
SET) are a deliberate exception. Autonomous transactions absorb the surrounding values and can propagate values they commit to the outer transaction. - Autonomous transactions can be nested, but there is a limit of 16 levels of autonomous transactions within a single session.
- Parallel query is not supported within autonomous transactions.
- The Advanced Server implementation of autonomous transactions is not entirely compatible with Oracle databases in that the Advanced Server autonomous transaction does not produce an ERROR if there is an uncommitted transaction at the end of an SPL block.
The following set of examples illustrates the usage of autonomous transactions. This first set of scenarios show the default behavior when there are no autonomous transactions.
Before each scenario, the dept table is reset to the following initial values:
SELECT * FROM dept;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+----------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
(4 rows)Scenario 1a – No autonomous transactions with only a final COMMIT
This first set of scenarios show the insertion of three rows starting just after the initial BEGIN command of the transaction, then from within an anonymous block within the starting transaction, and finally from a stored procedure executed from within the anonymous block.
The stored procedure is the following:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE insert_dept_70 IS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (70,'MARKETING','LOS ANGELES');
END;The PSQL session is the following:
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
insert_dept_70;
END;
COMMIT;After the final commit, all three rows are inserted:
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER BY 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+-------------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
50 | HR | DENVER
60 | FINANCE | CHICAGO
70 | MARKETING | LOS ANGELES
(7 rows)Scenario 1b – No autonomous transactions, but a final ROLLBACK
The next scenario shows that a final ROLLBACK command after all inserts results in the rollback of all three insertions:
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
insert_dept_70;
END;
ROLLBACK;
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER BY 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+----------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
(4 rows)Scenario 1c – No autonomous transactions, but anonymous block ROLLBACK
A ROLLBACK command given at the end of the anonymous block also eliminates all three prior insertions:
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
insert_dept_70;
ROLLBACK;
END;
COMMIT;
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER BY 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+----------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
(4 rows)This next set of scenarios shows the effect of using autonomous transactions with PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION in various locations.
Scenario 2a – Autonomous transaction of anonymous block with COMMIT
The procedure remains as initially created:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE insert_dept_70 IS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (70,'MARKETING','LOS ANGELES');
END;Now, the PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION is given with the anonymous block along with the COMMIT command at the end of the anonymous block.
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
insert_dept_70;
COMMIT;
END;
ROLLBACK;After the ROLLBACK at the end of the transaction, only the first row insertion at the very beginning of the transaction is discarded. The other two row insertions within the anonymous block with PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION have been independently committed.
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER BY 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+-------------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
60 | FINANCE | CHICAGO
70 | MARKETING | LOS ANGELES
(6 rows)Scenario 2b – Autonomous transaction anonymous block with COMMIT including procedure with ROLLBACK, but not an autonomous transaction procedure
Now, the procedure has the ROLLBACK command at the end. Note, however, that the PRAGMA ANONYMOUS_TRANSACTION is not included in this procedure.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE insert_dept_70 IS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (70,'MARKETING','LOS ANGELES');
ROLLBACK;
END;Now, the rollback within the procedure removes the two rows inserted within the anonymous block (deptno 60 and 70) before the final COMMIT command within the anonymous block.
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
insert_dept_70;
COMMIT;
END;
COMMIT;After the final commit at the end of the transaction, the only row inserted is the first one from the beginning of the transaction. Since the anonymous block is an autonomous transaction, the rollback within the enclosed procedure has no effect on the insertion that occurs before the anonymous block is executed.
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER by 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+----------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
50 | HR | DENVER
(5 rows)Scenario 2c – Autonomous transaction anonymous block with COMMIT including procedure with ROLLBACK that is also an autonomous transaction procedure
Now, the procedure with the ROLLBACK command at the end also has PRAGMA ANONYMOUS_TRANSACTION included. This isolates the effect of the ROLLBACK command within the procedure.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE insert_dept_70 IS
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (70,'MARKETING','LOS ANGELES');
ROLLBACK;
END;Now, the rollback within the procedure removes the row inserted by the procedure, but not the other row inserted within the anonymous block.
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
insert_dept_70;
COMMIT;
END;
COMMIT;After the final commit at the end of the transaction, the row inserted is the first one from the beginning of the transaction as well as the row inserted at the beginning of the anonymous block. The only insertion rolled back is the one within the procedure.
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER by 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+----------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
50 | HR | DENVER
60 | FINANCE | CHICAGO
(6 rows)The following sections now show examples of PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION in a couple of other SPL program types.
Autonomous Transaction Trigger
The following example shows the effect of declaring a trigger with PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION.
The following table is created to log changes to the emp table:
CREATE TABLE empauditlog (
audit_date DATE,
audit_user VARCHAR2(20),
audit_desc VARCHAR2(20)
);The trigger attached to the emp table that inserts these changes into the empauditlog table is the following. Note the inclusion of PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION in the declaration section.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER emp_audit_trig
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON emp
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
v_action VARCHAR2(20);
BEGIN
IF INSERTING THEN
v_action := 'Added employee(s)';
ELSIF UPDATING THEN
v_action := 'Updated employee(s)';
ELSIF DELETING THEN
v_action := 'Deleted employee(s)';
END IF;
INSERT INTO empauditlog VALUES (SYSDATE, USER,
v_action);
END;The following two inserts are made into the emp table within a transaction started by the BEGIN command.
BEGIN; INSERT INTO emp VALUES (9001,'SMITH','ANALYST',7782,SYSDATE,NULL,NULL,10); INSERT INTO emp VALUES (9002,'JONES','CLERK',7782,SYSDATE,NULL,NULL,10);
The following shows the two new rows in the emp table as well as the two entries in the empauditlog table:
SELECT * FROM emp WHERE empno > 9000; empno | ename | job | mgr | hiredate | sal | comm | deptno -------+-------+---------+------+--------------------+-----+------+-------- 9001 | SMITH | ANALYST | 7782 | 23-AUG-18 07:12:27 | | | 10 9002 | JONES | CLERK | 7782 | 23-AUG-18 07:12:27 | | | 10 (2 rows) SELECT TO_CHAR(AUDIT_DATE,'DD-MON-YY HH24:MI:SS') AS "audit date", audit_user, audit_desc FROM empauditlog ORDER BY 1 ASC; audit date | audit_user | audit_desc --------------------+--------------+------------------- 23-AUG-18 07:12:27 | enterprisedb | Added employee(s) 23-AUG-18 07:12:27 | enterprisedb | Added employee(s) (2 rows)
But then the ROLLBACK command is given during this session. The emp table no longer contains the two rows, but the empauditlog table still contains its two entries as the trigger implicitly performed a commit and PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION commits those changes independent from the rollback given in the calling transaction.
ROLLBACK;
SELECT * FROM emp WHERE empno > 9000;
empno | ename | job | mgr | hiredate | sal | comm | deptno
-------+-------+-----+-----+----------+-----+------+--------
(0 rows)
SELECT TO_CHAR(AUDIT_DATE,'DD-MON-YY HH24:MI:SS') AS "audit date",
audit_user, audit_desc FROM empauditlog ORDER BY 1 ASC;
audit date | audit_user | audit_desc
--------------------+--------------+-------------------
23-AUG-18 07:12:27 | enterprisedb | Added employee(s)
23-AUG-18 07:12:27 | enterprisedb | Added employee(s)
(2 rows)Autonomous Transaction Object Type Method
The following example shows the effect of declaring an object method with PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION.
The following object type and object type body are created. The member procedure within the object type body contains the PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION in the declaration section along with COMMIT at the end of the procedure.
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE insert_dept_typ AS OBJECT (
deptno NUMBER(2),
dname VARCHAR2(14),
loc VARCHAR2(13),
MEMBER PROCEDURE insert_dept
);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE BODY insert_dept_typ AS
MEMBER PROCEDURE insert_dept
IS
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (SELF.deptno,SELF.dname,SELF.loc);
COMMIT;
END;
END;In the following anonymous block, an insert is performed into the dept table, followed by invocation of the insert_dept method of the object, ending with a ROLLBACK command in the anonymous block.
BEGIN;
DECLARE
v_dept INSERT_DEPT_TYP :=
insert_dept_typ(60,'FINANCE','CHICAGO');
BEGIN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES (50,'HR','DENVER');
v_dept.insert_dept;
ROLLBACK;
END;Since insert_dept has been declared as an autonomous transaction, its insert of department number 60 remains in the table, but the rollback removes the insertion of department 50.
SELECT * FROM dept ORDER BY 1;
deptno | dname | loc
--------+------------+----------
10 | ACCOUNTING | NEW YORK
20 | RESEARCH | DALLAS
30 | SALES | CHICAGO
40 | OPERATIONS | BOSTON
60 | FINANCE | CHICAGO
(5 rows)